🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," said a leading MEP behind the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is primarily happening at the local level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to mimic this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

Even as this international conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and others show that states internationally are no longer willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.