🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute small “ham sandwich”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a sizeable but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a heart of gold.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a defunct facility, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the intense debate over their destiny often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government disallowed the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to end their lives unless the government funds the cost of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are remarkably smart animals – something a former trainer learned directly.

She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that involved building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their characters. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with different personalities.

“Eve selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each altered the way I perceive bonding.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales developed against a background of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her time at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a toll which the park links to natural mortality, but which campaigners say indicates the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The facility did not operate to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is falling apart from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and swim around with fragments in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a questionnaire, but earlier stated: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and constant care than any individual in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was fired from the facility in the spring following the passing of Eos, an sick beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the facility believed particulars of the death were shared to the press and she was let go soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in distress. She says the facility’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “considerable staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs calls for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a request to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the application would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience authorize an export that would prolong the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s statements indicate a wider incorrect perception of the realities of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers attempt to find a answer, proposals have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for local populations.

A proposed protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been highly debated. The planned site, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a sustainable resolution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat reflects a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the short term.

The project lead, leader of the plan, said the facility will replicate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the health of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|